governing law disputes · Terms of Service

Zarna policy finding

“ If for any reason, a Dispute proceeds in court rather than arbitration, the Dispute shall be commenced or prosecuted in the state and federal courts located in __________, and the Parties hereby consent to, and waive all defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, and forum non conveniens with respect to venue and jurisdiction in such state and federal courts. Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act (UCITA) are excluded from these Terms of Use. If this provision is found to be illegal or unenforceable, then neither Party will elect to arbitrate any Dispute falling within that portion of this provision found to be illegal or unenforceable and such Dispute shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction within the courts listed for jurisdiction above, and the Parties agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of that court.”

Document

Terms of Service

Captured

2026-08-11

Location

Terms of Service › “Binding Arbitration”

Snapshot SHA-256

4bfb3d3f3569434016e1072e5bc71e476ee5bc0f22d9c54113d46679ef82058e

Informational only, not legal advice. Terms change; verify the source and capture date.