Corrections
A correction never means a human editing the data. It means re-running the autonomous pipeline against a fresh snapshot.
What a correction is
If a vendor changes its policy, or you believe an assessment is out of date, a correction triggers an autonomous re-run: the system re-fetches the live document, captures a new immutable snapshot, re-extracts clauses, re-applies the verification gate and two-model consensus, re-scores, and republishes — entirely without human editing. The data is only ever written by the pipeline.
How to trigger one
Send a request to the public correction endpoint:
POST /api/corrections/{platform-slug}The platform's documents are enqueued for re-analysis and the worker (scripts/run-correction.mjs, also drained by the change-detection cron) executes the full re-run. Because every finding must re-pass the exact-substring verification gate against the new snapshot, a correction can only ever replace one machine-verified result with another.
Why no human edit path exists
A human-editable record could not carry the same guarantee. Every published claim traces to a verbatim quote anchored in an archived, hash-addressed snapshot; allowing manual edits would break that chain. The correction-as-re-run model keeps the entire dataset machine-verifiable end to end.
Generated from live pipeline data. Informational only, not legal advice.
AIRIN Brief
Built for compliance officers, legal counsel, and SaaS founders. Subscribe to the email digest — one short brief when a tracked vendor materially changes its terms, training policy, or risk rating. Prefer in-app? Watch platforms in your alerts inbox instead.
