governing law disputes · Terms of Service

Recraft V3 policy finding

“If the arbitrator finds that either the substance of a Claim or the relief sought in arbitration was frivolous, or a Claim was brought for an improper purpose, the parties may seek to re-allocate the fees and costs of arbitration, according to the rules of the arbitration provider. Exceptions to Arbitration – Small Claims and Injunctive Relief . Notwithstanding the foregoing, either party may elect to have any Claim that is subject to the jurisdiction of small claims court decided in small claims court in the City and County of San Francisco, California, USA. If either party files a Claim in arbitration that could have been brought in small claims court, the other party may provide notice that it wants the case decided in small claims court before the appointment of an arbitrator, and the arbitrator shall administratively close the case before assessing any fees, and the party bringing the Claim must proceed in small claims court in lieu of arbitration. Any dispute about whether a Claim qualifies for small claims court shall be resolved by that court, not by an arbitrator. In the event of any such dispute, the arbitration proceeding shall remain closed unless and until a decision by the small claims court that the Claim should proceed in arbitration. Additionally, either party shall be entitled to apply for preliminary injunctive remedies (or an equivalent type of urgent legal relief) in any jurisdiction, such as in the event of your or others’ unauthorized access to or use of the Services in violation of the Terms. ”

Document

Terms of Service

Captured

2026-06-08

Location

Terms of Service › “Arbitration Rules”

Snapshot SHA-256

022bdd9d1a429c1a45d41690208f42f5432a225198ef0543ec6539f7c61dce93

Informational only, not legal advice. Terms change; verify the source and capture date.