LedgerUp
Graded against 811 verified platforms, from its own policy text. Automated assessment against a published rubric — not legal advice.
No lens is bandable yet — banding requires fully verified documents with on-criteria findings. The gap is shown honestly, never estimated.
Partially verified: no core document fully assessed yet · Privacy Policy pending. Everything below comes only from what was read in full.
No verified risks yet
AIRIN has not published verified findings for this record yet. The page shows the gap instead of guessing.
How to read this page: Overall risk rates what LedgerUp's own policy terms mean for your prompts, outputs, and data. The benchmark bands below grade those same verified terms relative to peers — a platform in a risky-by-default category can rate HIGH risk and still grade STRONG against its peer set. Both trace to the cited findings.
Partially verified — Privacy Policy — Capture pending. Findings below are from fully-read, verified documents only; remaining core documents are pending capture.
Terms not yet captured
AIRIN has not yet captured a gate-verified Terms of Service document for this platform.
- Privacy PolicyCapture pending
Clause intelligence
Canonical clauses and stance patterns extracted from the same gate-verified citations shown on this page.
The clause imposes arbitration, class-action waiver, or jury-trial waiver terms.
“Any dispute arising out of or related to these Terms shall be resolved by binding arbitration administered by JAMS in Delaware, except that either party may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in the state or federal courts located in Delaware to protect its intellectual property or Confidential Information.”Open source citation
The clause grants a broad content license.
“The Client retains all ownership rights in data, materials, and information provided to or made accessible to the Company (“Client Data”). The Client grants the Company a limited, non-exclusive license to use Client Data solely to deliver, maintain, and support the Services.”Open source citation
The clause requires defense, indemnity, or hold-harmless obligations.
“The Client shall indemnify and hold harmless the Company from claims arising out of: the Client’s misuse of the Services the Client’s violation of applicable laws Client Data that violates applicable law, infringes third-party rights, or is provided in breach of the Client’s representations”Open source citation
The clause permits disclosure or sharing with third parties, affiliates, vendors, or subprocessors.
“The Company maintains a current list of subprocessors used to deliver the Services, available on the Company’s website. The Company will provide notice of material changes to its subprocessors as described in the DPA.”Open source citation
The clause permits disclosure or sharing with third parties, affiliates, vendors, or subprocessors.
“The obligations in this Section do not apply to information that: becomes publicly available through no fault of the receiving party was known to the receiving party prior to disclosure is received from a third party without breach of any confidentiality obligation is required to be disclosed by law, subject to reasonable notice where permitted”Open source citation
Tier matrix
Plan-level conditions detected from citation-backed clauses. Empty tiers mean AIRIN has not captured decisive tier language yet.
| Tier | Surface | Verdict | Risk | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| All applicable tiers | data retention | conditional | MEDIUM | 1 |
| All applicable tiers | governing law disputes | conditional | MEDIUM | 1 |
| All applicable tiers | indemnity liability | conditional | MEDIUM | 1 |
| All applicable tiers | privacy data use | conditional | MEDIUM | 1 |
| All applicable tiers | subprocessors data sharing | conditional | MEDIUM | 1 |
| All applicable tiers | training use | improves | LOW | 1 |
Policy evolution
Open full timelineBefore/after stance changes across captured policy versions. When no material delta exists yet, AIRIN shows the latest citation-backed stance events instead.
Latest stance: broad license on data retention
“The Client retains all ownership rights in data, materials, and information provided to or made accessible to the Company (“Client Data”). The Client grants the Company a limited, non-exclusive license to use Client Data solely to deliver, maintain, and support the Services.”Open timeline citation
Latest stance: third party or vendor sharing on privacy data use
“The Company maintains a current list of subprocessors used to deliver the Services, available on the Company’s website. The Company will provide notice of material changes to its subprocessors as described in the DPA.”Open timeline citation
Latest stance: third party or vendor sharing on subprocessors data sharing
“The obligations in this Section do not apply to information that: becomes publicly available through no fault of the receiving party was known to the receiving party prior to disclosure is received from a third party without breach of any confidentiality obligation is required to be disclosed by law, subject to reasonable notice where permitted”Open timeline citation
Latest stance: arbitration or waiver on governing law disputes
“Any dispute arising out of or related to these Terms shall be resolved by binding arbitration administered by JAMS in Delaware, except that either party may seek injunctive or other equitable relief in the state or federal courts located in Delaware to protect its intellectual property or Confidential Information.”Open timeline citation
Latest stance: indemnity on indemnity liability
“The Client shall indemnify and hold harmless the Company from claims arising out of: the Client’s misuse of the Services the Client’s violation of applicable laws Client Data that violates applicable law, infringes third-party rights, or is provided in breach of the Client’s representations”Open timeline citation
Latest stance: no training claim on training use
“The Company will not use Client Data, or any derivative of Client Data, to train generalized machine learning models intended for use across customers. The Company may train and tune models solely for the Client’s own use in delivering the Services to the Client.”Open timeline citation
Capture recency
- Privacy Policy:Last captured 2026-07-20
Dates state when our pipeline captured and verified each document — not when the vendor last changed it. Documents are re-scanned on a recurring cadence; a document verified once says so until a re-scan confirms it again.
38 findings first captured First scan: July 2026.
Compare and stack are saved in your browser. Open compare · View your stack. A correction triggers an automated re-read of LedgerUp's policies — no human edits the data.
Need this for procurement or legal diligence?
Free shows today's risk. A Stack Audit gives you a citable, verbatim-sourced PDF across your whole AI stack — and flags the moment a vendor's terms change.
Know where the missing document lives?
We haven't yet verified LedgerUp's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Point us at the official page and our pipeline will attempt to capture and read it in full. Submissions are candidates only — nothing is published until it passes the same verification gates as every other document on this site.
Every finding above is a verbatim quote from LedgerUp's own published policy, captured to an immutable snapshot and read in full through a two-gate verification pipeline. Confidence labels and any analysis are AI-generated and informational only — not legal advice.
AIRIN Brief
Built for compliance officers, legal counsel, and SaaS founders. Subscribe to the email digest — one short brief when a tracked vendor materially changes its terms, training policy, or risk rating. Prefer in-app? Watch platforms in your alerts inbox instead.