Skip to main content
Platform Review
PricingSign in
← Burt assessment

governing law disputes · Privacy Policy

Burt policy finding

“ If for any reason, a Dispute proceeds in court rather than arbitration, the Dispute shall be commenced or prosecuted in the state and federal courts located in San Francisco County, California, and the Parties hereby consent to, and waive all defenses of lack of personal jurisdiction, and forum non conveniens with respect to venue and jurisdiction in such state and federal courts. Application of the United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods and the Uniform Computer Information Transaction Act (UCITA) are excluded from these Legal Terms. In no event shall any Dispute brought by either Party related in any way to the Services be commenced more than one (1) years after the cause of action arose. If this provision is found to be illegal or unenforceable, then neither Party will elect to arbitrate any Dispute falling within that portion of this provision found to be illegal or unenforceable and such Dispute shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction within the courts listed for jurisdiction above, and the Parties agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of that court.”
Document
Privacy Policy
Captured
2026-07-19
Location
Privacy Policy › “Binding Arbitration”
Snapshot SHA-256
e1fa5a4457e2066205d6bfc26d220634efa1a091e871b930a9d24a347322aa02
Open captured source →

Informational only, not legal advice. Terms change; verify the source and capture date.

Canonical permalink: https://airinetwork.com/platform/burt/finding/governing-law-disputes-4e53ca4cc8482bfd3fc5

📢 POLICY UPDATES ALERT

AIRIN Brief

Built for compliance officers, legal counsel, and SaaS founders. Subscribe to the email digest — one short brief when a tracked vendor materially changes its terms, training policy, or risk rating. Prefer in-app? Watch platforms in your alerts inbox instead.